Grist-picked, but still ticked!
Saturday, November 15th, 2008 by SuzanneLunapads on Technorati
Last week, we were delighted to learn that our very own Lunapads Maxi Pad was picked by Grist among it’s review of eco-minded feminine products. Of course being picked is a bonus, but to us, it was great to see that Grist chose to cover the topic at all. Grist does environmental journalism with “news about green issues and sustainable living”. Grist strives to “to tell the untold stories, spotlight trends before they become trendy, and engage the apathetic.” Kind of like treehugger.com, but more light-hearted. Sarah Van Schagan covered the topic nicely, and will be doing a follow up story about tampon alternatives like the Diva Cup this week, so stay tuned!
However, one of their columnists, Umbra Fisk, gets me going every time she takes a “lite-green” stance on subjects near and dear to my heart. In her post in 2003 called “menstruation innovation“, prior to weighing in about natural alternatives like cloth pads and menstrual cups, she prefaces her comments by saying: “What we have here are small, popular disposable products, and generally speaking, the environmental impact of small objects is not worth fretting over.. Even if you do want to reduce your contribution to this minor environmental woe, there is a shortage of options in the moon-mama market.”
Excuse me? Not worth fretting over? Minor environmental woe? Is 14 billion pads, tampons and applicators going into North American landfills every year minor? That’s like saying that we shouldn’t worry about buying bottled water and switching to cloth shopping bags because, individually, we can’t make a difference. OK, maybe things have changed in the past 5 years and Umbra has seen the light. Nope. Last week, Umbra decided to weigh in on the cloth versus disposable diaper debate in her post called “Much a Poo About Nothing”. Well, we’ve posted about this issue before and know it isn’t easy always being green.
Using a cute but rather silly video, Umbra over simplifies the issue and completely missses the boat.
Not only do I disagree with her assessment (by lazily using a flawed 2005 study from the UK that has since been revised to state the opposite) that cloth and disposables are an environmental wash, but she doesn’t address the health impact of using disposables. Most disposable diapers use super absorbent polymers that can be harmful to babies (especially boys). Disposable diapers are made with pulp from virgin forests and laden with plastic that sit in landfills for 500 years. Yes, cloth diapers use water and energy to manufacture and clean, but water is a renewable resource and today’s high efficiency washers and dryers make a huge difference too. Her conclusion that it is a wash and not worth fretting over allows the apathetic to remain apathetic, which goes against the Grist mandate to engage the apathetic.Why do I care so much? Well, not only did I use (new and hand me down) cloth diapers on both my babies (and some elimination communication when ever possible) but it is obvious to me that this debate works equally well for the cloth vs disposable menstrual products debate. (ie: pad/tampon disposables are made from pulp, use chlorine bleach and leach dioxins in tampons, contain harmful chemicals and gels to make them more absorbent, etc.!)
If you care to weigh in, please do so here. Better yet, set up an account with Grist and tell Umbra what you think by commenting on her post!�












